Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected by ultrasound screening in individuals over 50 years of age: Argentine Multicenter Registry (SCREANRA). Federación Argentina de Cardiología

Authors

  • Gastón Mosso Hospital Central de Mendoza, Argentina
  • Ignacio Vogliotti Clínica E.J. Carrá, San Francisco, Córdoba, Argentina
  • Alejandro Peñaloza Hospital Marcial Quiroga, San Juan, Argentina
  • Fernando Gragera Hospital Italiano de Córdoba, Argentina
  • María J Castro LEBEN Salud, Neuquén, Argentina
  • Celeste Burguener CIMA, Corrientes, Argentina
  • Lucas Villedary Hospital Central de Mendoza, Argentina
  • Gerardo García Mallea Sociedad Española de Socorros Mutuos, Mendoza, Argentina
  • Adrián D’Ovidio Hospital Rawson y CIMAC, San Juan, Argentina
  • Laura Titievsky Instituto de Cardiología de Corrientes, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63600/rc0yxy52

Keywords:

Screening, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Cardiologists, Echocardiogram, Vascular echo Doppler

Abstract

Introduction: abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are a vascular condition associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases of rupture. Their prevalence increases with age and is higher in individuals over 65 years, although they may occur from the age of 50 in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, arterial hypertension, and atherosclerotic disease. Most patients remain asymptomatic for long periods, and diagnosis is often incidental or occurs after complications arise. Early detection through ultrasound allows identification of aneurysms at early stages and facilitates clinical follow-up. Materials and Methods: during cardiovascular or abdominal ultrasound examinations, the anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the abdominal aorta were measured. Patients older than 50 years with risk factors for AAA were included. Public and private medical centers from different provinces of Argentina participated in this multicenter registry. Results: a total of 2148 patients were included, 1063 men and 1085 women. Seventy-seven AAAs were detected, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 3.58%. Most cases were observed in patients older than 65 years. Conclusions: ultrasound evaluation of the abdominal aorta during cardiovascular or vascular studies allows the detection of AAA in patients with risk factors.

References

1. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873-2926.

2. Dos Santos SN, Alcantara ML, Freire CMV, Cantisano AL, Teodoro JAR, Carmen CLL, et al. Vascular ultrasound statement from the Department of Cardiovascular Imaging of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019;112(6):809-849.

3. Pham MH, Sigvardsen PE, Silesen H, Fuchs A, Afzal S, Kühl JT, et al. Aortic aneurysms in a general population cohort: prevalence and risk factors in men and women. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;25:1235-1243.

4. Cosford PA, Leng GC. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD002945.

5. Riambau V, Guerrero F, Montana X, Gilabert R. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and renovascular disease. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60:639-654.

6. Kent KC. Clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2101-2108.

7. Wright LB, Matchett WJ, Cruz CP, James CA, Culp WC, Eidt JF, et al. Popliteal artery disease: diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics. 2004;24:467-479.

8. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men. Lancet. 2002;360:1531-1539.

9. Perea G, Corneli M, D'Ovidio A. Búsqueda de aneurisma de aorta abdominal por cardiólogos. Rev Ecocar Pract (RETIC). 2020;3(1):66-68.

10. Sisó-Almirall A, Kostov B, Navarro-González M, Ramos R, Tebe C, Perelló R, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program using hand-held ultrasound in primary healthcare. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176877.

11. Sprynger M, Rigo F, Moonen M, Aboyans V, Edvardsen T, Alcantara M, et al. Focus on echovascular imaging assessment of arterial disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:119-129.

12. Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Le MT, Spencer CA, Tuohy RJ, et al. Population-based randomized controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329:1259.

13. Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, Scott RA. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1649-1656.

14. Brown LC, Powell JT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. Ann Surg. 1999;230:289-297.

15. Søgaard R, Lindholt JS. Cost-effectiveness of population-based vascular disease screening and intervention in men from the Viborg Vascular trial. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1283-1293.

16. Alasasfeh I, Abudawood R, Hwidi BE. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm discovered by pocket-sized ultrasound in a low-resource setting: a case report. Int J Emerg Med. 2024;17:1-4.

17. European Society of Cardiology. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024.

18. Lindholt JS, Sørensen J, Søgaard R, Henneberg EW. Long-term benefit and cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2010;97:826-834.

19. Senaratne JM, Raggi P. Screening for aortic aneurysms in patients with coronary artery disease: should it be done? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13(7):735-737.

20. Aboyans V, Bataille V, Bliscaux P, Ederhy S, Filliol D, Honton B, et al. Effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm during echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1100-1104.

21. Scott RA, Bridgewater SG, Ashton HA. Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg. 2002;89:283-285.

22. Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Egorova NN, Riles TS, Manganaro A, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:539-548.

23. Mofidi R, Goldie VJ, Kelman J, Dawson AR, Murie JA, Chalmers RT. Influence of sex on expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2007;94:310-314.

24. Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Senger CA, Coppola EL. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review. JAMA. 2019;322(22):2219-2238.

25. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Mortality results for randomized controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998;352:1649-1655.

26. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan WD, Blebea J, et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:441-449.

27. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease. Circulation. 2006;113:e463-e654.

28. Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, Boc V, Bossone E, Brodmann M, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3538-3700.

29. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17:472-475.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected by ultrasound screening in individuals over 50 years of age: Argentine Multicenter Registry (SCREANRA). Federación Argentina de Cardiología. Rev. Fed. Arg. Cardiol. [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Sep. 26];55(2):98-107. Available from: https://revistafac.org.ar/ojs/index.php/revistafac/article/view/802